BLE OF CONTENTS
|
SECTION |
TAB # |
|---|---|
|
1 | |
|
2 | |
|
3 | |
|
Local Program Leadership and Implementation
|
4 |
|
Critical Ongoing AFSM 100 Operational Processes
|
5 |
|
6 | |
|
7 | |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 | |
|
11 |
To: Plant Managers, AFSM 100 Processing Sites
Subject: AFSM 100 National Standardization Guide
The AFSM 100 represents a significant capital investment on the part of the US Postal Service. As a user of this critical technology, you play a key role in our future competitiveness.
This book has been designed to provide you with the critical operating policies, procedures, and instructions that will enable you to achieve our national performance targets. By operating to these, I am convinced you will be able to achieve the productivity and distribution quality levels that this technology offers. This will help reduce flats processing costs, which, of course, is an essential part of our strategy to grow this key product segment.
The book is designed to describe a standard process and drive consistent operating results throughout the USPS network. The procedures, described here, have already been proven to produce the performance targets shown. We are therefore, not only giving you an operating target to achieve; we are also giving you the process tools to achieve it. As the owner of this process, it is my obligation to you, the Operator - to provide you with a well-documented process that is capable of achieving the performance needed. Your obligation is to conform to the process and therefore be compliant with its procedures. (An electronic version of this book can be found on the National Standardization Web page.)
The implementation of this national standard process is concluded with your expected 'Certification' as an Operator (i.e., the AFSM 100 location, its operating personnel and management) who is in compliance with both the process procedures and the performance results. It is only natural, however, for processes to degrade over time. Therefore, periodic assessments of the process will be conducted, by the Areas, to assure that process compliance and performance results are maintained.
We are striving for more than just a process status quo. Like any successful business, we will, over time, make continuous improvements in what the process can achieve. To accomplish that, I am dependent on feedback and suggestions from you, and the other Operators throughout the national network, as you gain experience and find ways to improve the process. Your ideas, therefore, are welcome, encouraged and needed. As I receive them, we will review and evaluate those that can drive national improvements. These enhancements will then be combined and rolled out in subsequent releases of the AFSM 100 National Standardized Process.
This is an excellent process to use for Standardization and I am pleased to be its owner for many reasons:
Walt O'Tormey
Manager, Processing Operations
National Process Owner, AFSM 100
Corporate Flats Processing Strategy
The USPS is undertaking a major effort to improve flats processing. We are attacking our cost structures and performance levels across all of our flat processes in our processing system. Just as with our past automated letter strategy, we will drive down annual cost increases to be less than inflation, and we will improve our product quality to achieve service levels comparable to our current letter performance.
During the FY 2000 to FY 2002 period, we are rolling out 535 Automated Flat Sorting Machines, Model 100’s, (AFSM 100’s). These machines will replace our FSM 881 machines and will allow us to substantially reduce the volumes of flat mail sorted manually in plants and in delivery units. Additionally, the FSM 1000’s will be retrofitted for automated feeding and sorting for automated handling of oversize flats. The output from the AFSM 100’s and FSM 1000’s are much more uniform when mail processed is properly oriented when sorted. This also improves downstream processing.
Process improvements and costs savings will occur in waves with plants getting the first direct impact by replacing FSM881s with the higher productivity machines and by greatly reducing plant manual flats distribution. The second set of processes to gain from our new flats technologies will be our Customer Service clerical operations. We will be able to substantially reduce LDC 43 work hours as this wave of impacts takes effect. We also will provide carriers with earlier mail flows and with better oriented mail.
Standardization of our flat processes and the preparation & readability of flat mails by our originating mailers will be our primary tactics for achieving the targeted cost reductions and quality improvements. We will systematically certify all flat distribution sites in our network for compliance to the standardized processes and to the attainment of targeted performance levels.
AFSM 100 Theory of Operation
The AFSM 100 systems include an optical character reader, bar code reader, and on-line video coding system for processing OCR rejects. The AFSM 100 is equipped with three automatic feed stations and 120 stackers, and it has the capability of future stacker expansion. Those features, along with its high speed processing (over 17,000 pieces per hour), high OCR/BCR read rates, and the planned tie-in to material handling systems (e.g., Tray Management System), makes the AFSM 100 a highly efficient automated processor and minimal user of manual labor.
The AFSM 100 will provide additional machine capacity that must be optimized by properly managing the flow of mail. It processes mail approximately 2 - 3 times faster than the FMOCR/881 and its utilization needs to be maximized.
Operations managers need to continuously determine the availability of mail by type and class and process it on the equipment that will result in the lowest processing cost per thousand pieces. Given the capabilities of the AFSM 100, it will be the least costly of the three types of flat sorting equipment to operate based on throughput, the number of handlings required to finalize distribution, and staffing. However, due to mail type characteristics, read rates, service commitments and available processing windows, the AFSM 100 can only process approximately 80% of the current mail flat base. FSM 1000’s and typically one flat case per sort program will process the balance of the flat mail for primary distribution.
To help achieve our operational objectives, national standard procedures and work instructions have been developed for the operation of the AFSM 100 proven to achieve the performance levels in the table below. All employees (craft and management) need to be knowledgeable of, and trained in, the procedures and instructions that support these targets and understand these guidelines in relation to their duties.
A key finding in the initial deployment sites was the distinct correlation to AFSM 100 Standard Operating Procedures compliance and overall productivity. The initial sites' AFSM 100 inventory ranged from one to four machines. It is expected that volume per machine will fluctuate depending on availability of mail type, but productivity by source types should be maintained at national requirements. The following performance indicators and targets represent demonstrated levels of performance achieved through compliance to the processes and procedures in this guide.
The total AFSM 100 productivity target will vary depending on relative amount of Image load (as % of TPH), mailmix percentage (as % primary mail of total) and imagemix percentage (as primary images of total images). Below are three examples.
Note: With the exception of keyer performance requirements for speed and accuracy, the following are targets, not employee work performance standards. Also, for additional information on what an indicator means or how to measure it, please review the appropriate Work Instruction.
|
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: |
PERFORMANCE TARGETS: |
|---|---|
|
Total AFSM 100 productivity (Machine/VCS) |
1,995 pph (@ 55%/65%/ 9%**) |
| Total AFSM 100 productivity (Machine/VCS) |
2,065 pph (@ 75%/90%/ 9%**) |
| Total AFSM 100 productivity (Machine/VCS) |
1,705 pph (@ 55%/65%/16%**) |
|
Total pieces fed per AP per Machine |
Per FARM model commitment |
|
Primary Wall clock Hourly Throughput (Operational) |
15,000 |
|
Secondary Wall clock Hourly Throughput (Operational) |
13,000 |
|
Machine Staffing Level (Mail Processors) |
Up to 5 at full capacity |
|
Mail preparation staffing (based on 0% bypass) |
3 per machine hour |
|
VCS Staffing Level (DCOs) |
Based on Image Flow Workload |
|
Program Changeover time |
9 minutes maximum |
|
Composite Machine Productivity (55% Pri. 45% Sec.) |
2,548 pph |
|
Primary Machine Productivity |
2,693 pph |
|
Secondary Machine Productivity |
2,412 pph |
|
Composite DCO Keying Productivity (@ 75% Pri, 25% Sec) |
7150 strokes/hr* and 838 Images/hr |
|
DCO Keying productivity (@ 100% Primary) |
900 Images/hr |
|
DCO Keying productivity (@ 0% Primary) |
650 Images/hr |
|
DCO Keying Accuracy |
98% * |
|
Image Keying Finalization rate |
95% |
|
BCR/OCR Accept Rate |
95% |
|
Machine Error Rate |
1.3% max |
|
Machine unscheduled Downtime (report as % of total hours) |
% TBD (reporting still required) |
|
Jam Rate Per 1000 pieces fed |
3 per thousand pieces fed |
|
Preventive Maintenance (PM) on-time completion |
95% |
* Official performance requirements **) Primary Mailmix/Primary Imagemix/Images pr TPH%
AFSM 100 CRITICAL SUCCESS PROCESSES
There are six groups of critical success processes that drive the achievement to performance levels.
You need to invest wisely up front in implementing our new flats technology solutions so we will not expend funds later through long-term poor performance. All employees who operate or manage the AFSM 100’s and the various support operations need to be trained on all applicable procedures, instructions, and this Guideline. Furthermore, they need to fully understand how to best do their jobs so that they can achieve the targeted performance levels. Local leadership must dedicate and train critical resources for site preparation, training of employees, machine acceptance, machine ramp up, and site certification. A dedicated AFSM 100 coordinator is needed for roughly 60 days prior to machine deployment. This coordinator will need to continue until 30 days after the last machine is installed and certified as being in full compliance with the Standard Operating Processes and in full attainment of the targeted performance levels. The AFSM 100 coordinator must have the usage of cross-functional resources such as in-plant support, maintenance, customer services (Function 4), delivery programs support, budget, human resources, facilities, and Labor Relations. These resources will be used to identify FSM 881 volumes and manual volumes in plants and customer service units that can be captured and processed on the AFSM 100’s. They also will identify and capture the work hour savings and complement reductions from shifting this processing to the AFSM 100’s.
The following processes were also identified at National AFSM 100 Standardization Pilot Sites as driving cost performance of the AFSM 100. These processes are key to optimize machine throughput.
The most critical process steps are the preparation of mail and management of the mail flow. With untimely preparation and mail flow management, these high-speed machines easily run out of mail to process.
Also important is the management of transition periods, such as start-ups, program/tour changeovers, and dead times from jams and ineffective feeding / sweeping.
Proper staffing in any operation is important and the AFSM 100
is no exception. A very important point to keep in mind when staffing is
scheduled for an AFSM 100 is that it is a system of three parts: mail
preparation, direct machine distribution, and the Video Coding System. Staffing
for the machine itself has been determined. The following information is
provided to assist a site in determining the proper staffing for an AFSM 100
process.
Up to 5 Mail Processors (3 feeders and 2 sweepers), PS-4
Machine scheduling is done using Machine Scheduler LE. This simple EXCEL model will schedule individual operations and machine types, and optimize the utilization of the equipment. In addition to providing guidance in proper scheduling of the machine, the output from it provides the information required for the VCS staffing model described below. Once the machine scheduling is complete, the BPI Employee Scheduler will assist you in optimizing the daily and weekly employee schedules. Both of these models can be found at: http://blue.usps.gov/procops/btp/Breaktp.html
Data Conversion Operators (DCO’s), PS-4 as needed based on image generation rate.
The VCS Staffing model was developed to aid in determining the proper staffing of the VCS operation based on the mail type being run (reject rate of the BCR/OCR) and the keying rate of the Data Conversion Operators. In-plant support personnel should determine the parameters to input into the model based on the output of a machine-scheduling model. Output from the staffing model tells a site by hour how many DCOs should be scheduled. Since these models use averages, a site should staff the VCS room on the low side of the model recommendation to optimize workload management while controlling the work hours used. When local experience is gained from running the mail, an updated estimate of reject / keying rates can be used for the model.
3 mail preparation personnel per machine run hour (based on 0% bypass)
Mail preparation into FMC's typically takes about 3 employee hours per machine run hour to maintain the proper flow of prepared mail to the AFSM 100. This staffing level is based on mail actually prepped. Bypassed mail will allow this number to decrease and improve the locations' chances of achieving the Total AFSM 100 Productivity target. Different bypass rates require adjustment of this staffing.
To properly standardize any operations, standardized Communication Aids such as posters, signage, and pocket cards are needed. These are prepared and installed prior to machine acceptance and must be maintained after operation start-up. Ongoing communication of Supervisors with their crews, including daily AFSM 100 process discussions using performance tracking reports and discussion boards are needed to ensure the crews always understand their performance to targets, and that we transfer result ownership to our operators to the maximum extent possible.
PROCESS AND RESULTS CERTIFICATION
The USPS expects a new machine, such as the AFSM 100, to be fully operational and attaining its performance targets within 60 days of machine acceptance. After the 60-day ramp up period, the planned work hour reductions are taken out of each Performance Cluster’s budget. Historically, intended business targets have often been missed when processes have not been certified or otherwise validated to be effective. Initial certification, therefore, proves the demonstrated ability of a site to properly use all of the national standard processes and tools and to attain the nationally targeted performance levels.
Maintaining site certification is another critical process. Performing as planned over the long run is as important and as demanding as initial certification. Local re-certification, by Area personnel, occurs typically every six months, or as defined by the process owner. Ongoing Business Reviews for Performance Clusters need to incorporate key indicators and targets on the processing of flats. Local and Area assessments will be triggered randomly (about 80% of all) and from adverse performance variations (about 20%).
Individual locations that identify and test improved process approaches should forward these revised processes, with supporting test results, to the National Process Owner / Manager, Processing Operations for consideration for national application. Approved national enhancements need to be as fully implemented and documented as in the original process. Based on change complexity, re-certification may also be required.
NATIONAL PROGRAM LEADERSHIP
|
NAME |
HQ FUNCTION |
PHONE | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
NATIONAL PROCESS OWNER: |
Walter O'Tormey |
Manager, Processing Operations |
202-268-4305 |
|
PROCESS PROJECT LEADER: |
Ed Johnston |
Systems Integration Support |
202-268-4015 |
|
PROCESS PROJECT SUPPORT: |
Mauro Licciardello |
Operations |
202-268-4148 |
|
NATIONAL STANDARDIZATION SUPPORT: |
Bob Scanlon |
Manager, Core Applications. HQ Quality |
202-268-6208 |
NATIONAL AFSM 100 IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT TEAM
|
FUNCTION |
NAME |
PHONE |
|---|---|---|
|
ACQUISTION MANAGEMENT |
Anthony Ferlaino |
703-280-7325 |
|
ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT |
Bev Carter |
703-280-7876 |
|
EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT (TRAINING) |
Monica Walls |
405-366-4767 |
|
EXECUTIVE PROGRAM DIRECTOR, NGFSM |
Elliot Siegel |
703-280-7845 |
|
LABOR RELATIONS |
Dan Magazu |
202-268-3825 |
|
MAINTENANCE TECH SUPPORT |
Tom Fuchs |
405-573-2125 |
|
MAINTENANCE SUPPORT |
Owen Guessford |
703-280-7907 |
|
DELIVERY PROGRAMS AND POLICIES |
Jim Schield |
202-268-6071 |
|
PROCESSING OPERATIONS |
Susan Cocci |
202-268-3559 |
|
FIELD EXECUTIVE |
Gary W. Johnson |
843-760-5391 |
|
SYSTEMS PROCESS INTEGRATION |
Bruce Enter |
703-280-7188 |
AREA AFSM 100 COORDINATORS
|
AREA |
NAME |
PHONE |
|---|---|---|
|
ALLEGHENY AREA |
Robert Prince |
412-494-2549 |
|
CAPITAL METRO AREA |
Jug Bedi |
301-548-1407 |
|
GREAT LAKES AREA |
Patricia Davis |
630-539-4752 |
|
MID-ATLANTIC AREA |
Stephen Bond |
703-824-5083 |
|
MID-WEST AREA |
Daryl Ashbacher |
314-692-5313 |
|
NEW YORK METRO AREA |
Bob Hart |
718-321-5754 |
|
NORTHEAST AREA |
Ron Grady |
860-285-7213 |
|
PACIFIC AREA |
Brad Fulton |
650-635-3042 |
|
SOUTHEAST AREA |
Dennis K. Smith |
901-747-7450 |
|
SOUTHEAST AREA |
Larry Kintner |
901-747-7637 |
|
SOUTHWEST AREA |
Ken Brown |
214-819-8623 |
|
SOUTHWEST AREA |
Melisa McCrea |
214-819-8618 |
|
WESTERN AREA |
Gary Hegstad |
303-313-5973 |
LOCAL AFSM 100 IMPLEMENTATION COORDINATOR
NAME: __________________________________
PHONE: _________________________________
E-Mail: ___________________________________
The primary role of the AFSM 100 coordinator is to get the AFSM 100 machine installed, accepted, and operating in full compliance with the National Standardization Guide and other applicable documentation. Following this, the location needs to transition the long term oversight support and achievement to program expectations to the Mgr, P&DC or designee.
Duties:
NOTE ON AFSM 100 COORDINATOR
The role of the AFSM 100 Coordinator is that of an Ongoing Program Manager. The position plays a key role in the successful implementation and continuing operation of the AFSM 100, serving as the central point for dissemination of information, feedback, and inter-functional linkages. Detailed information on Project Management can be found by accessing the USPS "blue" home page, selecting "site map" then selecting "Program Management" under Headquarters Organizations.
Successful implementation of the AFSM 100 requires an integrated approach by various functional units; each contributing tasks vital to the overall mission. This overview furnishes a macro-level information tool supported by the indicated source references. It is advised that the AFSM 100 Coordinator and all functional department coordinators also review both the AFSM 100 Implementation Guide and the AFSM 100 Support Guide for additional specifics relative to their tasks and for continuing operation.
LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION ORGANIZATION CHART
AREA MIPS / MOS and AFSM 100 COORDINATOR
LOCAL AFSM 100 COORDINATOR*
HUMAN RELATIONS
IN-PLANT SUPPORT*
MAIL PROCESSING
MAINTENANCE
LABOR RELATIONS
TRANSPORTATION
FINANCE
OPERATIONS PROGRAM SUPPORT (F-4)*
* denotes high resource commitment during implementation
LOCAL AFSM 100 IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT TEAM
|
FUNCTION |
NAME |
PHONE |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Coordinator |
|||
|
IPS |
|||
|
OPS/F-4 |
|||
|
Budget |
|||
|
HR (Labor) |
|||
|
HR (ER) |
|||
|
Mail Processing |
|||
|
Maintenance |
|||
|
Facilities |
|||
|
Transportation |
The following is a text schematic of the AFSM 100 implementation process through location Certification, demonstrating the phases of the effort.
IMPLEMENTATION OF AFSM 100
Pre-Installation
60 Days Prior - Site Team Established
7 Days Prior – Sort Programs, Mail Volume and Base Set. Train Craft & Supervisors
Installation
Post-Installation – Ramp-Up
10 Days After – Individual Supervisor & Employee Demonstrated Ability Verification
45 Days After – Formal Walk-through
52 Days After – Full Operation Certification
60 Days – Budget Reductions and Process Assessments Begin
240 Days
DCO has 12 weeks/60 days to reach full ability
WORK INSTRUCTION – PREPARATION FOR LOCAL PROCESS CERTIFICATION
PROCESS OWNER: MANAGER, PROCESSING OPERATIONS
|
STEP # |
Responsibility |
Process action, dependencies and outputs |
|---|---|---|
|
Entire process location |
Initial implementation of the process completed. New/changed equipment (if applicable) installed and operational. | |
|
Site management |
Assigns personnel to measure and, if required, improve the site’s running of the process until it has been Certified. This assignment includes a local Process Coordinator, who is considered the leader of the assigned team. Although this constitutes a delegation of work, site management is still fully responsible for the site’s process being certified. | |
|
Site management |
Ensures that all assigned site personnel receive the required training in the process, all its applicable documentation, its national performance and productivity targets, as well as the needed internal assessment training before proceeding with the process improvement effort. | |
|
Local process coordinator / certification team |
Conducts a baseline assessment of the process per W-AF621, using the appropriate Checklist sheets, T-AF625 (blank example in Appendix I). To perform this, the location needs to have established data sources and calculation formulas for each performance and productivity category being measured. If such sources cannot be identified or fully relied on, the Area should be contacted to ensure consistent data sources and interpretations. All noncompliances are documented on sheet T-AF625 and in an Assessment Report submitted to plant management (If the site plans on drawing on the Area personnel for help with corrective action, the Area should also receive a copy of the Assessment Report.) Arrange the results so as to facilitate causal analysis and action plan development. | |
|
Local Certification Team |
The team initiates Corrective Action Request forms, T-626 (blank example shown in Appendix II) for each natural grouping of noncompliances and other shortfalls in performance / productivity. The team then analyzes each gap (noncompliance / shortfall) and develops low-level causes (root causes if appropriate). | |
|
Local Certification Team |
The causes that are associated with "how" the tasks are performed are addressed immediately through training and practice. What now remain are the causes that are management / supervision influenced. These could fall into many different categories:
| |
|
Local Certification Team |
Measures the impact of the corrective training in step #5. Updates and, if needed repeats the gap analysis. | |
|
Local Certification Team |
The team develops an action plan for executing the remaining management/supervision based corrective actions. This plan contains, at a minimum, timelines, responsibilities, and sign-off by those who have taken on these responsibilities. | |
|
Site management |
Reviews / approves the remaining causes developed by the team. If a cause is within the control of location management / supervision, signs off on its CAR, T-626, with "who and when". Provides needed resources for all corrective action. | |
|
Local Certification Team |
Upon site management’s approval of the Action Plan, the team implements the plan. As the gaps are closed the team starts the clock collecting the applicable performance / productivity records (to assemble the required two weeks worth of data needed for initial Certification). Upon completion of the full implementation and with two weeks records of meeting performance and productivity targets, perform a comprehensive Internal Assessment, using the Checklist in the National Standardization Guide. If 100% of the performance/productivity targets are sustained for a minimum of 2 weeks and checklist compliance percentage is 90% or higher, request an Area Certification assessment. Where the 90% minimum compliance required for formal Certification is not met the qualification process moves back to Step # 8 for a revision of the Action Plan and subsequent implementation change. | |
|
Entire process location |
Upon receipt of the National Process Certification, the location is seriously advised to undertake a solid celebration. Meeting or exceeding national targets that are set high enough to make USPS fully competitive in the process merits strong recognition. Once certified the location needs to remain certified. This is not as easy a task as it appears on the surface (it is rather analogous to keeping weight off after having lost it). The location needs to establish the habit of not shortcutting the standard process activities, even if seemingly for good causes. To ensure that a national certification remains a continuously earned professional recognition, Area’s and HQ will undertake random, periodic compliance assessments that will need to be successfully passed for a location’s certification to remain in force. On the average, each location will receive 1-2 such assessments per year. |
APPENDIX I
|
PROCESS: |
PLANT ASSESSED: |
||||||
|
ASSESSED BY: |
PERSONS INTERVIEWED: |
||||||
|
DATE: |
QUESTION#: |
||||||
|
REQUIREMENTS: (stated from reference)
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE: PERFORMANCE PRODUCTIVITY: COMPLIANCE TO DOCUMENTS: | |||||||
|
VERIFICATION METHOD:
| |||||||
|
NONCOMPLIANCE(S) / OBSERVATION(S):
STATUS OF NONCOMPLIANCE(S)/OBSRVATION(S):
| |||||||
|
* KEY FOR STATUS C = CLOSED, F = FOLLOW-UP, O = OPEN (CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED) | |||||||
APPENDIX II
Corrective Action Request (CAR)
|
Non-compliance description: | |
|
Cause per preliminary analysis: | |
|
Interim action taken: | |
|
Proposed permanent Corrective Action and completion date: | |
|
Responsible Manager/Date: | |
|
Accepted. | |
|
Rejected, because: | |
|
Audit Manager/Date: | |
|
Result of Causal Analysis: | |
|
Corrective Action taken: | |
|
Date CA proven effective: | |
|
Responsible Manager/Date: | |
|
Corrective Action validated effective. CAR closed. | |
|
Validation Method: | |
|
Rejected, because: | |
|
Audit Manager/Date: | |
CRITICAL ONGOING AFSM 100 OPERATION PROCESSES
WORK INSTRUCTION: SUPERVISING AFSM 100 OPERATIONS
PROCESS OWNER: MANAGER, PROCESSING OPERATIONS
National standard procedures and work instructions have been developed for the operation of the AFSM 100 proven to achieve critical performance levels covered in the Executive Summary.
Eight critical operational processes have been documented at the System Level Procedure or the Work Instruction level and are presented in this Standardization Guide. Below is a short summary of the contents of each of these critical processes. On the following pages is each individual document in the order of the summaries below:
SYSTEM LEVEL PROCEDURE (Micro):AFSM 100 OPERATION
Process Owner: Manager, Processing Operations
FLOWCHART of PROCESS:
|
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: |
PERFORMANCE TARGETS: |
|---|---|
|
Total AFSM 100 productivity (Machine/VCS) |
1,995 pph (@ 55%/65%/ 9%**) |
|
" " " " |
2,065 pph (@ 75%/90%/ 9%**) |
|
" " " " |
1,705 pph (@ 55%/65%/16%**) |
|
Total pieces fed per AP per Machine |
Per FARM model commitment |
|
Primary Wall clock Hourly Throughput (Operational) |
15,000 |
|
Secondary Wall clock Hourly Throughput (Operational) |
13,000 |
|
Machine Staffing Level (Mail Processors) |
Up to 5 at full capacity |
|
Mail preparation staffing (based on 0% bypass) |
Up to 3 per machine hour |
|
VCS Staffing Level (DCOs) |
Based on Image Flow Workload |
|
Program Changeover time |
9 minutes maximum |
|
Composite Machine Productivity (55% Pri. 45% Sec.) |
2,548 pph |
|
Primary Machine Productivity |
2,693 pph |
|
Secondary Machine Productivity |
2,412 pph |
|
Composite DCO Keying Productivity (@ 75% Pri, 25% Sec) |
7150 strokes/hr* and 838 Images/hr |
|
DCO Keying productivity (@ 100% Primary) |
900 Images/hr |
|
DCO Keying productivity (@ 0% Primary) |
650 Images/hr |
|
DCO Keying Accuracy |
98% * |
|
Image Keying Finalization rate |
95% |
|
BCR/OCR Accept Rate |
95% |
|
Machine Error Rate |
1.3% max |
|
Machine unscheduled Downtime (report as % of total hours) |
% TBD (reporting still required) |
|
Jam Rate Per 1000 pieces fed |
3 per thousand pieces fed |
|
Preventive Maintenance (PM) on-time completion |
95% |
*) Official Performance Requirements **) Primary Mailmix/Primary Imagemix/Images pr TPH%
5) PROCESS DESCRIPTION [For Flow sequence, see PROCESS FLOWCHART in 1)]
|
STEP # |
Responsibility |
Process action, dependencies and outputs |
|---|---|---|
|
00. |
AFSM 100 supervisor |
Prior Tour wrapping up. |
|
0. |
AFSM 100 supervisor |
Prior Tour wrapping up. |
|
1. |
Maintenance |
Per W-AF345:
|
|
2. |
AFSM 100 supervisor |
Per W-AF123:
Per W-AF124, loads the proper sort program.
|
|
3. |
Employee(s) as assigned |
Brings all flats to the proper AFSM 100. |
|
4. |
Employee assigned to mail preparation |
Culls pieces with the following characteristics:
If flats are not cancelled, the AFSM 100 operation, in Step #5, is preceded by cancellation and the mail returned to the AFSM 100. |
|
5. |
AFSM 100 operator |
Culls mail with plastic coating sticking, mail in excess of 15", too small, or thicker than ¾" and loads the remainder with address facing the scanner and bond edge down. |
|
6. |
AFSM 100 supervisor |
Per W-AF123, ensures:
|
|
7. |
AFSM 100 operator |
Operates the AFSM 100 per W-AF345 "AFSM 100 Feeder Operations". |
|
8. |
Data Conversion operator |
Unreadable bar code or address images are displayed on the DCO’s terminal for coding. This process can be made highly productive by use of "speed keys" to reduce keystrokes (these need to be programmed, by the IPS, at the Supervisor terminal). |
|
9. |
AFSM 100 supervisor |
Ensures proper productivity by monitoring keying performance of DCO’s. (For criteria, see Section 3, Performance Metrics). |
|
10. |
AFSM 100 operator (sweeper or feeder) |
Clears jams per W-AF125. Responsibility determined per clearing method chosen per W-AF125. |
|
11. |
AFSM 100 operator (sweeper) |
Sweeper sweeps bins when full while labeling and repositioning empty bins. |
|
12. |
AFSM 100 supervisor |
Per W-AF123, ensure:
|
|
13. |
AFSM 100 operator |
Per W-AF345, performs Normal Shut down, including:
|
|
14. |
AFSM 100 supervisor |
Operation ready for next Tour. |
|
15. |
AFSM 100 supervisor |
Operation ready for next Tour. |
WORK INSTRUCTION: SUPERVISING AFSM 100 OPERATIONS
PROCESS OWNER: MANAGER, PROCESSING OPERATIONS
All supervisors assigned to AFSM operations.
|
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: |
PERFORMANCE TARGETS: |
|---|---|
|
Total AFSM 100 productivity (Machine/VCS) |
1,995 pph (@ 55%/65%/ 9%**) |
| Total AFSM 100 productivity (Machine/VCS) |
2,065 pph (@ 75%/90%/ 9%**) |
| Total AFSM 100 productivity (Machine/VCS) |
1,705 pph (@ 55%/65%/16%**) |
|
Total pieces fed per AP per Machine |
Per FARM model commitment |
|
Primary Wall clock Hourly Throughput (Operational) |
15,000 |
|
Secondary Wall clock Hourly Throughput (Operational) |
13,000 |
|
Machine Staffing Level (Mail Processors) |
Up to 5 at full capacity |
|
Mail preparation staffing (based on 0% bypass) |
Up to 3 per machine hour |
|
VCS Staffing Level (DCOs) |
Based on Image Flow Workload |
|
Program Changeover time |
9 minutes maximum |
|
Composite Machine Productivity (55% Pri. 45% Sec.) |
2,548 pph |
|
Primary Machine Productivity |
2,693 pph |
|
Secondary Machine Productivity |
2,412 pph |
|
Composite DCO Keying Productivity (@ 75% Pri, 25% Sec) |
7150 strokes/hr* and 838 Images/hr |
|
DCO Keying productivity (@ 100% Primary) |
900 Images/hr |
|
DCO Keying productivity (@ 0% Primary) |
650 Images/hr |
|
DCO Keying Accuracy |
98% * |
|
Image Keying Finalization rate |
95% |
|
BCR/OCR Accept Rate |
95% |
|
Machine Error Rate |
1.3% max |
|
Machine unscheduled Downtime (report as % of total hours) |
% TBD (reporting still required) |
|
Jam Rate Per 1000 pieces fed |
3 per thousand pieces fed |
|
Preventive Maintenance (PM) on-time completion |
95% |
*) Official Performance Requirements **) Primary Mailmix/Primary Imagemix/Images pr TPH%
Supervisor’s Overall Responsibilities:
The supervisor’s responsibility is to facilitate the achievement of USPS targets for flats through:
Managing Total AFSM 100 Productivity:
TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY = TOTAL PIECES HANDLED / TOTAL WORKHOURS USED
Total AFSM 100 Productivity, as accounted for above, is made up of the total volume sorted/handled on the AFSM 100 divided by the total workhours used on the machine (MODS 330C) and for DCO keying of images the machine could not resolve (MODS 381/382). In real terms, the total productivity also includes the preparation of the flats for the AFSM 100. However, no measurement mechanism exists to account for this. To obtain dependable productivity measurements, both mail volumes and workhour usage need to be obtained, documented, tracked, and analyzed.
Although a bit oversimplified, one could state that all the supervisor needs to do to be successful is to achieve the Total AFSM Operational Productivity target for each of the machines. To accomplish this, a supervisor must manage the two drivers of this performance, machine operations and keying productivity. Although not part of the overall productivity formula, AFSM 100 mail-preparation productivity is equally important.
Below is a table that summarizes key 'valves' the supervisor must turn to achieve the total AFSM 100 productivity target:
Performance Drivers that Optimize Productivity
|
Productivity Category |
Key influencing Activities |
|---|---|
|
Mail Prep Productivity |
|
|
Productivity Category |
Key influencing Activities |
|
Machine Productivity |
|
|
DCO Keying Productivity |
|
Managing AFSM 100 machine Throughput:
Maximize Pieces Fed by keeping the machine running. To accomplish this, the supervisor needs to:
To maximize Pieces Accepted (i.e. high Accept Rate):
Accounting Period Target for Pieces Fed/Throughput
The AFSM 100 machines should be used nearly around the clock except during preventative maintenance periods and when no volumes exist. This means that each tour needs to contribute every day.
The primary objective is to maximize the volume of mechanized/automated flat mail and minimize manual distribution volumes in the plants and delivery units. This mail will come from Function 4 operations in the Stations/Branches and Associate Offices and Function 1 operations in the plant. The expectations are that every plant will process the 5-digit zones from the FARM model every day.
Staffing and Scheduling
Plants receiving AFSM 100s will establish dependent Remote Encoding Centers (RECs) within the Plant for image keying and adhere to the work rules and staffing mix previously established for the RECs.
Based on observations, it is estimated that it takes approximately 40 minutes for one person to fill an FMC. If the throughput rate on the AFSM 100 is 14,100 pieces per hour (@55% Primary mail) and the average volume of mail in a FMC is 3,200 pieces, then the supervisor should plan on having 4-5 FMCs of prepared mail available for every hour of processing. This, of course, assumes that only mail from FMCs is being processed. If the operation is being supplemented by mail in flat tubs, the requirement for FMC mail will be less per hour.
Program Changeover (AFSM 100 machine area):
Program changeover (for specifics, see W-AF124, "AFSM 100 End of Run/Program Changeover") has considerable productivity leverage. AFSM 100 supervisor and craft go through a well planned and almost choreographed 30 minutes preparation, prior to Program changeover, followed by 20 minutes of sweeping, dispatching and tub labeling to minimize the time when the AFSM 100 is not operating.
The 50 Minute Process to manage a good 9 minute Changeover window
Planning and Preparation
-30 to –7 Minutes:
@ -30, Supervisor starts to ensure adequate prepped mail and equipment for the next program.
@ -20, Sweeper #1 verifies that labels are available for the next run.
Final Feed
-7 to 0 Minutes:
@ -7, Feeder #1 pulls up next program mail, cleans up rejects and tubs around all 3 feeders.
@ -7, Feeder #2 & #3 ensure even feed so that all stations run out simultaneously @-4 min.
@ -4, All feeders reload feed stations with next program mail, finish clearing of feeder area.
Program Changeover
0 to +5 Minutes:
@ 0, Supervisor changes computer to next run program.
@ 0, 3 feeders and 1 sweepers pull down machine and replaces trays.
@ 0, 1 sweeper dispatches pulled out tubs (approximately 50% dispatched by +5 minutes).
Next Program Running
+5 to +20 Minutes:
@ +5, Restart machine for next run.
@ +5, 2 sweepers complete dispatching.
<10, Hold off labeling.
@ +10, Sweepers label all trays while monitoring initial tray fill-up.
@ +20, Trays again filled to normal operational levels and sweepers resume normal duties
Managing transition periods (AFSM 100 machine area):
It is important to manage employee changeovers effectively during transition periods to minimize machine down time and maximize throughput.
Working and communicating with others:
Constructive communication with key organizations/personnel is the lubricant that keeps the performance at optimum level. These organizations/personnel are:
One example of such communication might be working with IPS for tips and suggestions on setting up special bins and high-density bins on the machine. One could learn that it is more efficient to combine low volume zones into one super sort plan (mult